Commit 5c8612642b

@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ fn mirArithmetic2Op(emit: *Emit, inst: Mir.Inst.Index) !void {
             .@"return" => try emit.writeInstruction(Instruction.@"return"(Register, rs1, rs2)),
             .cmp => try emit.writeInstruction(Instruction.subcc(Register, rs1, rs2, .g0)),
             .mov => try emit.writeInstruction(Instruction.@"or"(Register, .g0, rs2, rs1)),
-            .not => try emit.writeInstruction(Instruction.xnor(Register, .g0, rs2, rs1)),
+            .not => try emit.writeInstruction(Instruction.xnor(Register, rs2, .g0, rs1)),
             else => unreachable,
         }
     }

@@ -158,8 +158,9 @@ pub const Inst = struct {
         /// This uses the arithmetic_2op field, with rs1
         /// being the *destination* register.
         // TODO is it okay to abuse rs1 in this way?
-        // TODO this differs from official encoding for convenience, fix it later
-        not, // not rs2/imm, rs1 -> xnor %g0, rs2/imm, rs1
+        // not rs2, rs1 -> xnor rs2, %g0, rs1
+        // not imm, rs1 -> xnor %g0, imm, rs1
+        not,
     };
 
     /// The position of an MIR instruction within the `Mir` instructions array.