Commit 0f54194e6a
Changed files (1)
src
src/analyze.cpp
@@ -2681,48 +2681,50 @@ static Error resolve_struct_alignment(CodeGen *g, ZigType *struct_type) {
assert(decl_node->type == NodeTypeContainerDecl);
assert(struct_type->di_type);
+ size_t field_count = struct_type->data.structure.src_field_count;
if (struct_type->data.structure.layout == ContainerLayoutPacked) {
struct_type->data.structure.abi_alignment = 1;
- }
-
- size_t field_count = struct_type->data.structure.src_field_count;
- bool self_resolving = false;
- for (size_t i = 0; i < field_count; i += 1) {
- TypeStructField *field = &struct_type->data.structure.fields[i];
-
- // If we have no type_entry for the field, assume that we are in the
- // midst of resolving this struct. We further assume that since the
- // resolved alignment of the other fields of this struct is ultimately
- // equal to the resolved alignment of this struct, we can safely ignore.
- //
- // If this struct is used down-stream in aligning a sub-struct, ignoring
- // this struct in the context of a sub struct has the same effect since
- // the other fields will be calculated and bubble-up.
- if (nullptr == field->type_entry) {
- self_resolving = true;
- continue;
- }
-
- if (type_is_invalid(field->type_entry)) {
- struct_type->data.structure.resolve_status = ResolveStatusInvalid;
- break;
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < field_count; i += 1) {
+ TypeStructField *field = &struct_type->data.structure.fields[i];
+ if (field->type_entry != nullptr && type_is_invalid(field->type_entry)) {
+ struct_type->data.structure.resolve_status = ResolveStatusInvalid;
+ break;
+ }
}
+ } else for (size_t i = 0; i < field_count; i += 1) {
+ TypeStructField *field = &struct_type->data.structure.fields[i];
+ uint32_t this_field_align;
+
+ // TODO If we have no type_entry for the field, we've already failed to
+ // compile the program correctly. This stage1 compiler needs a deeper
+ // reworking to make this correct, or we can ignore the problem
+ // and make sure it is fixed in stage2. This workaround is for when
+ // there is a false positive of a dependency loop, of alignment depending
+ // on itself. When this false positive happens we assume a pointer-aligned
+ // field, which is usually fine but could be incorrectly over-aligned or
+ // even under-aligned. See https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/1512
+ if (field->type_entry == nullptr) {
+ this_field_align = LLVMABIAlignmentOfType(g->target_data_ref, LLVMPointerType(LLVMInt8Type(), 0));
+ } else {
+ if (type_is_invalid(field->type_entry)) {
+ struct_type->data.structure.resolve_status = ResolveStatusInvalid;
+ break;
+ }
- if (!type_has_bits(field->type_entry))
- continue;
+ if (!type_has_bits(field->type_entry))
+ continue;
- // alignment of structs is the alignment of the most-aligned field
- if (struct_type->data.structure.layout != ContainerLayoutPacked) {
if ((err = type_resolve(g, field->type_entry, ResolveStatusAlignmentKnown))) {
struct_type->data.structure.resolve_status = ResolveStatusInvalid;
break;
}
- uint32_t this_field_align = get_abi_alignment(g, field->type_entry);
+ this_field_align = get_abi_alignment(g, field->type_entry);
assert(this_field_align != 0);
- if (this_field_align > struct_type->data.structure.abi_alignment) {
- struct_type->data.structure.abi_alignment = this_field_align;
- }
+ }
+ // alignment of structs is the alignment of the most-aligned field
+ if (this_field_align > struct_type->data.structure.abi_alignment) {
+ struct_type->data.structure.abi_alignment = this_field_align;
}
}
@@ -2732,14 +2734,6 @@ static Error resolve_struct_alignment(CodeGen *g, ZigType *struct_type) {
return ErrorSemanticAnalyzeFail;
}
- if ( self_resolving
- && field_count > 0
- ) {
- // If we get here it's due to self-referencing this struct before it has been fully resolved.
- // In this case, set alignment to target pointer default.
- struct_type->data.structure.abi_alignment = LLVMABIAlignmentOfType(g->target_data_ref,
- LLVMPointerType(LLVMInt8Type(), 0));
- }
struct_type->data.structure.resolve_status = ResolveStatusAlignmentKnown;
return ErrorNone;
}